Serbian Election Campaign Escalates as Pegasus Spyware Found on University Rector’s Phone

Security researchers have identified Pegasus spyware on the mobile device of the University of Belgrade's rector, adding to a growing list of Serbian opposition figures allegedly targeted ahead of the upcoming national elections. The discovery, reported by The Record, marks the latest incident in a series of alleged cyber intrusions aimed at political opponents and prominent public figures in Serbia.

The finding follows earlier reports that two additional opposition leaders were subjected to similar surveillance, suggesting a broader pattern of digital espionage. Pegasus, a sophisticated surveillance tool developed by the Israeli firm NSO Group, has been linked to covert monitoring operations in multiple countries, often raising concerns about privacy violations and state overreach.

Serbia is set to hold parliamentary elections later this year, a contest that could reshape the country's political landscape. Critics have warned that the alleged use of spyware against opposition members may undermine the fairness of the electoral process by intimidating dissenting voices and compromising confidential communications. The rector's case underscores how academic institutions, traditionally viewed as neutral spaces, are not immune to political pressures.

While Serbian authorities have not publicly commented on the specific allegations, international watchdogs have called for transparent investigations into the use of surveillance technology against political actors. The European Union, which has been monitoring democratic standards in the Western Balkans, has previously highlighted concerns about media freedom and judicial independence in Serbia, and the latest revelations could intensify scrutiny.

Experts say that the exposure of Pegasus on high‑profile devices may prompt broader debates about digital security and the regulation of commercial spyware. As the election approaches, opposition parties are likely to demand stronger safeguards against illicit monitoring, while civil‑society groups may push for legislative reforms to limit the acquisition and deployment of such tools. The unfolding situation highlights the intersection of technology, politics, and human rights in a region striving for greater democratic accountability.